Peer Review Policy

Introduction to peer review

Peer review is conducted to ensure that the journal publishes good scientific paper. This benefits the entire scientific community. Sometimes authors find the peer review process daunting because it can lead to rejection of their manuscripts. Remember that revisions and revisions are part of the publication process and actually help improve the quality of your manuscript.

Peer review is an integral part of scientific publications that confirm the validity of the reported science. Peer reviewers are experts who donate their time to help refine the journal manuscripts they review—they offer free advice to authors. Through the peer review process, the manuscript must be:

(1) More robust: Peer reviewers may point out gaps in your paper that require further explanation or additional experimentation.

(2) Easier to read: If there is a part of your paper that is difficult to understand, the reviewer can let you know so you can correct it.

(3) More useful: Peer reviewers also consider the importance of your paper to others in your field.

Of course, in addition to offering advice to authors, another important purpose of peer review is to ensure that the manuscript that is ultimately published in the journal is of high quality. If a journal publishes too many low-quality manuscripts, its reputation and readership will decline.

Peer-review Methods

Especially for Praxis, the review method used is open peer-review where the manuscript will be reviewed by 1 external reviewer and 1 editor who is also a reviewer. We realized that the type of manuscript in the form of an activity report is not like a science manuscript that requires rigorous review.

Review Speed

- 14 days Editor's Initial Response Since the Manuscript was sent.

- 30 - 45 days Editor's Final Decision.

Please contact Emai: editorpraxisunusia@gmail.com if your manuscript does not receive a response for more than 14 days.